Ferrari’s anonymous blogger, The Horse Whisperer, has spoken out in his usual derisory way on the fuss about Pirelli’s tyres in F1, following last weekend’s shameful Spanish Grand Prix.
The race, which saw both Ferrari drivers on the podium (Alonso first, Massa third), ended up with some 82 pit stops across the field of 20 cars. Red Bull Racing, whose success in 2013 has been curtailed by the high degradation of Pirelli’s tyres, could only finish with a best place of fourth, even though this still leaves Sebastian Vettel leading the world championship standings.
Red Bull’s boss, Dietrich Mateschitz, was furious, describing the situation as ridiculous and saying “This has nothing to do with racing any more. This is a competition in tyre management..”.
Ferrari’s spokeshorse naturally sees things differently..
The Horse Whisperer – Tyred and emotional
These are difficult times for people with poor memories. Maybe it’s because of the huge amount of information available today that people are too quick to talk, forgetting things that happened pretty much in the recent past. Or maybe the brain cells that control memory only operate selectively, depending on the results achieved on track by their owners.
A classic example of this is the current saga regarding the number of pit stops. Voices have been raised to underline the fact that various teams, some of whom got to the podium and others who were quite a way off, made four pit stops in the recent Spanish Grand Prix, making the race hard to follow.
It’s a shame that these worthy souls kept quiet two years ago when, at the very same Catalunya Circuit and on the Istanbul track, five of the six drivers who got to those two podiums made exactly the same number of pit stops as did Alonso and Massa last Sunday in the Spanish Grand Prix.
In fact, there’s nothing new about winning a race making so many pit stops, even discounting those where it was down to changeable weather. One only has to look back to 2004, when Michael Schumacher won the French Grand Prix thanks to what was a three stop strategy, later changed to a four stopper. That was the key which allowed the multiple champion’s F2004 to get ahead of the then Renault driver, Fernando Alonso, who made three stops. And on that day and we remember it well, our strategy and the tyre supplier were showered with praise for allowing us to get the most out of the car.
Today however, it seems one must almost feel ashamed for choosing a strategy that, as always for that matter, is aimed at getting the most out of the package one has available. On top of that, if this choice emerges right from the Friday, because all the simulations are unanimous in selecting it, then why on earth should one feel embarrassed when compared to those who have gone for a different choice, only to regret it during the race itself.
Written By
Try These Next
Stories we think you'll enjoy
well said ….whingers …they got their way anyway….poor little sebastian…he was going at the pace of the tyres and not the pace of the car …oh !!!!! …ferrari too ..right ???…we went at the pace of the tires or where we on different tyres….bad bad bad loosers…dont worry guys …pirelli are doing tyres just for you and you can go at the pace of the car…..have a good trip
It’s funny isn’t it? There’s obviously some measure of truth in the issue of having too many pit stops, but it’s a level playing field, so the issue is for ‘the sport’ not an individual team.
I love reading Ferrari’s Horse Whisperer, he so politically incorrect, which means most of what he says is worth listening to.. 🙂