If you work in the automotive sector then you’ll be heartened to read the 2011 Edelman Trust Barometer, the company’s 11th annual research study into the trust and credibility of businesses around the world. For 2011 Automotive climbs to become the 2nd most trusted industry sector, just behind Technology which retained the No.1 spot for a second year in a row.
Much has happened in this sector during the past 12 months, which has been through one of its darkest periods as the global financial meltdown more than halved sales for some manufacturers and in some cases even more.
General Motors who until 2008 (and the previous 77 years) was the largest car maker in the world, reached out for bankruptcy protection and was bailed out together with Chrysler by the US government. Ford fared slightly better, but still turned to an emergency line of credit to stay afloat. However in November, GM posted the largest initial public offering (IPO) in history, at $23.1 billion and according to the Edelman barometer, “earned back half of the trust it had lost in 2009.”

But what does this all mean, and how can these positive vibes be sustained?
Trust is not the same thing as truth
The simple reality of doing business makes telling the truth an unrealistic proposition, in a competitive marketplace information may correlate directly with competitive advantage and therefore some companies feel they need to control the conversation across their organisation and ensure it’s as generic as possible. Communication is sometimes seen as a necessary evil rather than a tool to be wielded effectively.
However trust is born from a sense of congruity – put simply, ‘saying what you will do and then doing what you say’. Transparency is another term that’s sometimes overused, but again it doesn’t mean opening the doors and revealing every secret.
In reality though, many organisations are realising that it’s impossible to control the conversations of every employee, instead it’s far more realistic to foster and maintain a consistent spirit and tone, rather than the actual words that are written or spoken.
Managing this conversation is increasingly reliant on spokespersons, experts and leaders sifting through the media jumble and synthesising a truth that people can then take and further validate. It is interesting to note from Edelman’s report that “multiple voices” are now seen as the best way of communicating as CEOs, 3rd parties, company executives, and industry experts all have a role to play.
Trust comes from corroboration

A company which hides behind the veil of the one-dimensional spokesperson will lose its personality and it’s this personality that customers relate to. As a Consultancy Director with Pricewaterhouse Coopers back in the mid-’90s we developed a process which examined every aspect which drives a company’s shareholder value, and the most significant factor was that of revealing sufficient information to enable customers and investors to validate what a company is saying.
Edelman’s research shows that a company’s reputation with its customers depends on 3-5 sources of information corroborating each story, but the most interesting finding was that trust in Western countries was declining relative to that in Developing countries – one of the characteristics which differentiate the two markets is the far greater choice available to us here in the USA and Europe, but there’s also an over-abundance of information which can quickly confuse and fatigue an audience.
Social media provides the means to convey a personality
The automotive sector has really embraced social media as a means of sustaining a relationship with its car buyers – Ford, who had been one of the biggest spenders on advertising turned away from above-the-line tactics and embraced social media, bringing on board Scott Monty who has transformed Ford’s dialogue with its customers and engaged many thousands in the most interactive campaigns of 2010.
Other brands worthy of note include Volkswagen and MINI, both of whom are using social media as a means to build greater trust, loyalty and credibility with their customers.
Further Reading
- Why is the automotive industry so trusted?Becca Caddy – Reputation Online, 28th January 2011
- Edelman’s 2011 Trust Barometer paints a sceptical picture of the UKVikki Chowney – Reputation Online, 25th January 2011
Hybrid motoring – the opposite of corporate greed?
We are in the midst of the most profligate period in recent history, the banking industry has been responsible for almost bankrupting every major government, yet Goldman Sachs will be paying out an average bonus of £269,000 for each employee and cities in Greece, Tunisia and now Egypt have been gripped by riots as ordinary citizens rebel against what they see as wealthy companies and governments getting richer.

A further key reason behind automotive’s rise in the trust index can be explained by the increasing move towards green, environmentally conscious and hybrid motoring. Car makers have cleverly positioned hybrid cars as being a proactive response to society, building something sustainable for future generations and its Toyota/Lexus who have been at the forefront of this momentum.
This has never been more evident than with last year’s widely criticised “unintended acceleration” problem, which led to the recall of nearly 4 million vehicles worldwide amidst a media frenzy that seemed to have little purpose other than to destroy Toyota’s reputation. Despite the efforts of some news agencies, a poll of American consumers thereafter (by Rasmussen) found that 59% of consumers viewed Toyota positively, whilst 22% viewed Toyota very favourably.
This can partly be explained by the very public apology of Toyota’s President, Akio Toyoda, who said at the time, “When consumers purchase a Toyota, they are not simply purchasing a car, truck or van. They are placing their trust in our company. The past few weeks, however, have made clear that Toyota has not lived up to the high standards we set for ourselves. More important, we have not lived up to the high standards you have come to expect from us. I am deeply disappointed by that and apologize. As the president of Toyota, I take personal responsibility. That is why I am personally leading the effort to restore trust in our word and in our products. ”
Stirring stuff, but perhaps the other reason for consumers remaining positive and trusting Toyota is because of their dominant position as the leading global provider of hybrid cars and thererfore its identity as a symbol of environmental and social consciousness.

Edelman go on to describe this phenomenon by their ‘trust triangle’ which is based on the expectation that trust is built when companies act collaboratively to benefit society, not just its shareholders. 15 years ago when we were building reputation->value models, transparency was at the top of the list whilst society and the environment were in the lower quartile. Now it seems businesses must build strategies which bring value to both investors and society.
The automotive sector is in a position to reap more benefit from this transformation in trust than any other sector – it has been forced into greater transparency by the recent financial crisis, has embraced social media as a more effective medium for sustained customer relationships and offers the greatest potential for every person to contribute to the environment and society by embracing cleaner and more efficient methods of transport.
Clearly reaching No.2 in Edelman’s trusted industry sector league is just the beginning, and automotive should be aiming for the top spot over the next couple of years.
Source: all data and illustrations obtained from 2011 Edelman Trust Barometer Executive Summary, which you can obtain by visiting their dedicated site.
Written By

Steve Davies
Steve is an investor, private equity advisor and former Partner at KPMG, PwC and Bain. Most importantly he's a life-long car enthusiast, mountain biker and active sports enthusiast. He designs and builds technology platforms and is the architect behind Transmission.
Try These Next
Stories we think you'll enjoy
October 23, 2015
Caterham’s future owners must get a grip on its ailing business
Caterham’s future owners have much to do, repairing and rebuilding a business that just four years ago was acquired in good health by Malaysian…
September 24, 2015
Das Sham – what next for Volkswagen?
Just because Sebastian Vettel does a very good Kimi impression doesn’t mean that every German has a natural talent for humour. Enter Michael Horn,…
June 11, 2014
Caterham engineers for lightness at Hingham
Yesterday's news of redundancies at CTI (Caterham Technology and Innovation) sends out worrying signals about the Caterham Group. On the face of it,…
23 Comments
Add comment Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Charles, the stance I take is that I don’t believe we should get too caught up on the measurement of trust, but instead focus more on how it can be influenced for the benefit of companies and markets. Just over 15 years ago we ran a parallel kind of index – we were looking at trust from the perspective of shareholder value and delving deep to understand what enables a company to translate the value it creates in a market into the stock market price of its shares (and therefore its market value).
Back then we (and our clients) spent many millions trying to measure this value, but looking back on this process the crux of its usefulness was to understand what would drive such value and assist executive teams to focus on a handful of the most useful factors.
As I mention in my article above, trust is mainly linked to demonstrating a connection between what is said and what is done – that sounds like stating the obvious, but most businesses find that quite a challenge. But what you’re creating is a process (and example if you like) which is representative of such a trust-reinforcing process and using this to connect with the stakeholders that you want to convey this to.
There are some fascinating reasons why the automotive sector has gained in its trustworthiness – and it’s not just noise – firstly many big players were brought to their knees and this exposed them as vulnerable and frail, the barriers came down and a connection was made (or not) with their customers, then the increasing engagement via social media is building a much closer relationship between brands and customers and finally the whole momentum towards hybrid and environmental motoring is reinforcing a set of values that demonstrate social responsibility. Add these factors together (and shake vigorously!) and you find some of the reasons.
It’s an interesting report and I’m sure the teams at Edelman don’t consider it prescriptive, but there are certainly some useful inspirational ideas that come through from reading it.
Last year is the recession period for the global Financial. The automotive sector has really embraced social media as a means of sustaining a relationship with its car buyers